Top 10 Philippine Supreme Court jurisprudence discussing the proper execution of a warrant of arrest, including their G.R. numbers and a single-sentence summary of each ruling:
- Sayo v. Chief of Police of Manila, G.R. No. L-2128 (1948)
- The Court clarified that after warrantless arrest, the arrested person
must be delivered to the proper judicial authority within the period
prescribed by Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code, emphasizing the
necessity of judicial oversight in detention
- Viudez II v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 152889 (2004)
- The Supreme Court ruled that the implementation of a warrant of arrest
cannot be suspended pending a petition for review before the Department of
Justice, as the judge’s authority to issue and enforce warrants is
exclusive
The Court held that upon conviction, the trial court must immediately
issue a warrant of arrest for the execution of the sentence, and delay in
execution does not extinguish liability unless the penalty has prescribed
People
v. Doria, G.R. No. 125299 (1999) The Court emphasized that the arresting officer must identify himself,
state his authority, and inform the person to be arrested of the cause of
arrest, following Rule 113 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The Supreme Court reiterated that a judge must personally determine
probable cause before issuing a warrant of arrest, not merely rely on the
prosecutor’s certification.
- The Court clarified that after warrantless arrest, the arrested person
must be delivered to the proper judicial authority within the period
prescribed by Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code, emphasizing the
necessity of judicial oversight in detention
- The Supreme Court ruled that the implementation of a warrant of arrest cannot be suspended pending a petition for review before the Department of Justice, as the judge’s authority to issue and enforce warrants is exclusive
The Court held that upon conviction, the trial court must immediately
issue a warrant of arrest for the execution of the sentence, and delay in
execution does not extinguish liability unless the penalty has prescribed
 |
People
v. Doria, G.R. No. 125299 (1999) The Court emphasized that the arresting officer must identify himself,
state his authority, and inform the person to be arrested of the cause of
arrest, following Rule 113 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The Supreme Court reiterated that a judge must personally determine
probable cause before issuing a warrant of arrest, not merely rely on the
prosecutor’s certification.
The Court ruled that law enforcement must strictly comply with the
requirements of informing the accused of the warrant and the cause of
arrest to ensure the validity of the arrest
The Supreme Court stressed that non-compliance with the requirements of a
lawful arrest, including the presentation of the warrant and informing the
accused of their rights, renders the arrest illegal.'
The Court ruled that law enforcement must strictly comply with the
requirements of informing the accused of the warrant and the cause of
arrest to ensure the validity of the arrest
The Supreme Court stressed that non-compliance with the requirements of a
lawful arrest, including the presentation of the warrant and informing the
accused of their rights, renders the arrest illegal.'
Looking for a reliable and affordable study companion for the 2025 Bar Exams? The Law Requisites PH offers expertly curated digital case digests designed specifically for bar examinees, law students, and legal professionals. With concise, organized content tailored to support your review and legal practice, you can now access these powerful tools for only ₱499. Start strengthening your preparation today by visiting https://beacons.ai/thelawrequisitesph. Your bar success begins with the right resources—get yours now!
📢DISCLAIMER:
This content is for educational purposes only and does not guarantee the infallibility of the legal content presented. All content was created using premium AI tools and reviewed for accuracy to the best of our abilities. Always consult a qualified legal professional for legal advice.
No comments:
Post a Comment