Imagine that You send your daughter abroad for a better life. A year later, she returns home in a casket, her death ruled “suicide.” But signs of violence scream otherwise.

  TOPIC: RIGHTS OF OFWS - PART 10 OF 10 

Can a recruitment agency and its foreign principal be held jointly and solidarily liable for the mysterious and violent death of an overseas Filipino worker that occurred outside official duty hours but within employer-provided premises?

 

Title of the Case:
BECMEN SERVICE EXPORTER AND PROMOTION, INC. v. SPOUSES SIMPLICIO and MILA CUARESMA (for and in behalf of their daughter, Jasmin G. Cuaresma), WHITE FALCON SERVICES, INC. and JAIME ORTIZ, President, White Falcon Services, Inc.
G.R. Nos. 182978-79 and G.R. Nos. 184298-99 | April 7, 2009

 

Facts of the Case

Jasmin Cuaresma, a 25-year-old Filipina nurse, was deployed to Saudi Arabia in January 1997 by Becmen Service Exporter and Promotion, Inc., under a 3-year employment contract. She was assigned to Al-Birk Hospital with a monthly salary of US$247. In June 1998, she was found dead inside her dormitory with foam in her mouth and a strong odor of poison, suggesting suicide per Saudi police and hospital reports.

However, upon repatriation, the Cabanatuan City Health Officer and the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) in the Philippines conducted independent autopsies. These revealed multiple internal and external injuries including rib fractures, vaginal abrasions, and hematomas, suggesting violent physical abuse and possibly rape. The NBI’s toxicology report also found no traces of poison.

Jasmin's parents, Simplicio and Mila Cuaresma, received basic death benefits from the Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA) but sued Becmen and its Saudi principal Rajab & Silsilah Company for compensatory, moral, and exemplary damages. They claimed Jasmin was a victim of a work-related criminal act.

The Labor Arbiter dismissed the case, finding Jasmin’s death to be a suicide, unrelated to her employment. However, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reversed this decision and ruled that Jasmin’s death was compensable, awarding her heirs US$80,000 in actual damages. The NLRC held Becmen and White Falcon Services, Inc.—the successor local agent—solidarily liable.

The Court of Appeals, in its Amended Decision, drastically reduced the award to US$4,686.73, equivalent to the remainder of Jasmin’s unexpired contract. It ruled that future earnings were speculative and moral damages were unwarranted.

Both parties appealed to the Supreme Court.

 

Main Legal Issue Reiterated:

Can a recruitment agency and its foreign principal be held jointly and solidarily liable for the violent, mysterious death of an OFW that occurred outside working hours but within employer-provided accommodation?

 

Ruling of the Supreme Court:

The Supreme Court set aside the Court of Appeals' Amended Decision. It ruled that Jasmin did not commit suicide but was a victim of criminal aggression. The Court condemned the employer’s and recruiters' gross inaction and callousness in seeking justice for Jasmin. It found that they failed to fulfill their legal, moral, and social responsibilities under the Migrant Workers Act (R.A. 8042). Hence, Becmen, White Falcon, Rajab, and their corporate officers were held jointly and solidarily liable.

 

Dispositive Portion:

“WHEREFORE, the Amended Decision of the Court of Appeals dated May 14, 2008… is SET ASIDE. Rajab & Silsilah Company, White Falcon Services, Inc., Becmen Service Exporter and Promotion, Inc., and their corporate directors and officers are found jointly and solidarily liable and ORDERED to indemnify the heirs of Jasmin Cuaresma… the following amounts:

1. ₱2,500,000.00 as moral damages;
2. ₱2,500,000.00 as exemplary damages;
3. Attorney’s fees equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the total monetary award; and,
4. Costs of suit.”

 

Should Philippine recruitment agencies be criminally liable for gross neglect in protecting OFWs, especially in cases of suspicious deaths abroad?

 

Key Doctrines:

1. Joint and Solidary Liability of Recruitment Agencies –
   “Private employment agencies are held jointly and severally liable with the foreign-based employer for any violation of the recruitment agreement or contract of employment.”
2. Moral and Exemplary Damages under Articles 19, 21, and 24, Civil Code –
   Moral damages are awarded when acts are done in bad faith or against morals and public policy. Recruitment agencies failed to act despite clear evidence of foul play.
3. Primacy of OFW Protection (R.A. 8042) –
   “The State shall provide adequate and timely social, economic and legal services to Filipino migrant workers.”
4. Employer’s Premises Not Automatically Work-Related –
   The Court acknowledged that being in the dormitory does not conclusively mean the incident is work-connected—but other compelling evidence may override this presumption.

 

Classification: Labor Law

 

Looking for a reliable and affordable study companion for the 2025 Bar Exams? The Law Requisites PH offers expertly curated digital case digests designed specifically for bar examinees, law students, and legal professionals. With concise, organized content tailored to support your review and legal practice, you can now access these powerful tools for only ₱499. Start strengthening your preparation today by visiting https://beacons.ai/thelawrequisitesph. Your bar success begins with the right resources—get yours now!

📢DISCLAIMER:

This content is for educational purposes only and does not guarantee the infallibility of the legal content presented. All content was created using premium AI tools and reviewed for accuracy to the best of our abilities. Always consult a qualified legal professional for legal advice.

CHAT WITH ME! (CLICK HERE)

READ FULL TEXT

🎓 LAW SCHOOL SHORTS: Labor Law Doctrines You Must Remember!
🔍 Case Digest & Doctrines Review Series for Law Students and Bar Takers

 

📌 Welcome, future lawyers and baristas! In this video, we’ll briefly explore a significant Supreme Court decision that will sharpen your understanding of Labor Law doctrines, especially those involving OFW protection, recruitment agency liability, and moral damages under Philippine law.

This episode features the case of:

"BECMEN SERVICE EXPORTER AND PROMOTION, INC. v. SPOUSES CUAESMA, et al."
G.R. Nos. 182978-79 & G.R. Nos. 184298-99 | Promulgated: April 7, 2009

👉 Parties involved:

• Petitioner: Becmen Service Exporter and Promotion, Inc.
• Respondents: Spouses Simplicio and Mila Cuaresma (parents of deceased OFW Jasmin Cuaresma), White Falcon Services, Inc., and its President, Jaime Ortiz.

📖 Nature of the Case: Labor Law – Compensation for OFW Death Abroad
🎯 Purpose of this video: To help law students and bar examinees recall 10 important doctrines as ruled by the Supreme Court in this landmark decision.

 

📝 BRIEF CASE SUMMARY:

Jasmin Cuaresma, an OFW nurse in Saudi Arabia, was found dead in her dormitory under suspicious circumstances. Initial reports suggested suicide by poisoning. However, subsequent Philippine autopsies revealed signs of violent physical abuse and possible rape, casting doubt on the suicide theory.

Despite this, the recruitment agencies refused to act, alleging suicide and denying liability.

The Supreme Court rejected the suicide theory, declared Jasmin a victim of criminal aggression, and held Rajab, Becmen, and White Falcon (and their officers) jointly and solidarily liable to her parents for ₱2.5M in moral damages, ₱2.5M in exemplary damages, attorney’s fees, and costs.

---

💬 Should Philippine recruitment agencies be held criminally accountable for gross neglect in protecting OFWs abroad? Comment below!

 

📚 TOP 10 IMPORTANT DOCTRINES FROM THE CASE:

1. Recruitment Agencies’ Solidary Liability (Labor Code & R.A. 8042)

Recruitment agencies are solidarily liable with their foreign principals for OFW claims under contracts, even post-deployment. (Supreme Court Decision, p. 77)

2. Moral Damages Under Article 21, Civil Code

Acts contrary to good morals, such as abandonment of a distressed OFW’s case, justify moral damages. (Decision, p. 89)

3. Employer’s Dormitory ≠ Automatic Work Premises

The employer’s dormitory does not automatically equate to a workplace for compensation claims unless the injury is clearly work-related. (Decision, p. 58)

4. Presumption Against Suicide

Suicide is not lightly presumed; strong evidence is required, especially when victim circumstances are inconsistent with suicidal behavior. (Decision, p. 61)

5. Public Policy on OFW Protection (R.A. 8042)

Recruitment agencies must uphold state policy to protect migrant workers; failing to act violates public policy. (Decision, p. 87)

6. Joint and Several Liability of Corporate Officers

Corporate directors/officers of recruitment agencies can be personally liable for damages under R.A. 8042. (Decision, p. 88)

7. Doctrine of Social Justice in Labor Law

Labor law is infused with social justice—in dubio pro operario applies when evidence is unclear. (Decision, p. 94)

8. Employer Responsibility Even Beyond Duty Hours

In certain contexts, employers may be held liable for employee harm even beyond duty hours if employer-provided housing is unsafe. (Decision, pp. 57-58)

9. Failure to Investigate = Bad Faith

Refusal to investigate an OFW’s suspicious death and labeling it suicide without basis shows gross bad faith. (Decision, p. 85)

10. Exemplary Damages for Public Good

Employers and recruiters who act oppressively may be ordered to pay exemplary damages to serve as a warning and for the public good. (Decision, p. 90)

 

⚠️ DISCLAIMER:
This video is intended for educational purposes only. It does not guarantee infallibility or substitute for actual legal advice or jurisprudential study. Always refer to the official Supreme Court decision and consult primary sources. This content was created using premium AI assistance.

 

🔔 Don’t forget to LIKE, SHARE, and SUBSCRIBE for more Law School Review Shorts and Bar Exam Tips!

#LaborLaw #OFWRights #BarExamPH #LegalDoctrine #CaseDigest #LawStudentPH #SupremeCourtPH #BarReview #LegalShorts #BECMENCase